Should college athletes be paid? Let’s take a quick glance at the pros and cons of each perspective.
By the way, there’s a part two to this Should College Athletes be Paid… series.
For starters, in my opinion, yes, college athletes should get paid. What deserves debate, is the conversation of how to get this done.
From my experience, in America, you get paid in proportion to the value you bring to the marketplace. College sports is one, if not the only, place where this isn’t the case.
I think it’s only a matter of time before players start getting more than “a free education.”
I was recently thinking about the potential pro’s and con’s that surround this topic, and thought I’d blog about it.
Cons of Paying College Athletes
1. Dealing with Title IX
According to Title IX, a federally-mandated law, if conferences and schools decide to increase the value of student-athlete scholarships to cover living expenses, they have to do it for women’s programs as well.
This means that schools would have to, for example, increase the value of womens volleyball and softball scholarships as well. Schools have to stay in-accordance with Title IX, otherwise they’re risking their federal funding.
…and you know they’re not trying to lose out on any money.

In 2010, USC was hit with a two-year bowl ban, four years’ probation, loss of scholarships, and forfeits of an entire year’s games for improper benefits to 2005 Heisman Trophy winner Reggie Bush. (Image – kclauson)
2. Competitive disadvantage for small schools.
How would the smaller schools and conferences afford this? The bigger conferences make way more money than the smaller conferences through their huge tv deals.
So unless the Big Ten’s, and SEC’s of the world agree to donate revenue to conferences that make afraction of what they make, (think MAC and Mountain West conferences), wouldn’t this create an even wider gap recruiting-wise between the powerhouse conferences and the smaller conferences?
I mean, ask yourself; if you were to choose between playing football for a small school, and a big school that’s legally giving you $5,000 in living expenses, which would you choose?
Most college athletic programs are already losing money, so how could they afford to all male and female athletic programs, to cover for the athlete’s living expenses?
3. Do you pay the athletes from all sports?
Let’s be real here; men’s football and basketball teams are usually the programs that make the most money for universities, so if football players and basketball players got paid, does that mean that the men’s lacrosse and baseball players would get paid too?
How can you discriminate? Sports like lacrosse and baseball don’t normally bring in as much money as football and basketball, so how do you address that?
I honestly don’t have an answer for you.
4. Player’s are still going to take “under the table” money.
In my opinion, increasing scholarship amounts to cover living expenses may keep some of the kids from accepting money, but it’s not going to keep them all from doing it.
I don’t think kids getting an extra $5,000 or so from their Universities wouldn’t keep the agents, boosters, etc., from offering them cash and benefits.
And I’m not convinced it would keep them from taking it, either.
But I must admit, it’s definitely a step that I believe would at least keep some of the kids from accepting benefits; those that only take the money because of their circumstances or lack of cash for living expenses.
Click here for Should College Athletes Be Paid? Pros and Cons… Part 2.
Do you think college athletes should get paid? Why or why not?
Follow me on Twitter. @alvingrier
Click here to connect with us on Facebook.






College athletes are already getting paid…in their free education, housing, and food.
Pingback: cheap edu links
Pingback: Jeffrey Fralin
Pingback: Emile Gizzo
Pingback: Tonita Mitch
Pingback: Tamekia Iossa
Pingback: Kathy Wahington
Pingback: Wayne Hrobsky
Pingback: Leann Kelson
Pingback: Arlen Rabb
Pingback: Refugio Latif
Pingback: Alanna Gleave
Pingback: Claude Deraney
Pingback: Alec Flora
Pingback: My Homepage
Last van erectiestoornissen? Dan is viagra echt iets voor jou! Viagra zorgt er namelijk voor de bloedvaten in de penis zich makkelijker kunnen ontspannen waardoor erectieproblemen tot de verleden tijd behoren. Wil je direct viagra kopen? Dan kan dat natuurlijk ook!
Wie wil het nou niet? Erotisch contact met honderden of zelfs duizenden vrouwen en mannen. Iedereen toch? Voor de lekkerste dates zit je dan ook goed bij ons. Daten is natuurlijk helemaal gratis en anoniem!
These athletes as everyone knows are not at school to learn. They are recruited for their athletic ability and the value they may have for the school. NCAA athletics is all about the money, not about the “student” athletes. This is why almost every NCAA player majors in the easiest subject they can. Look at Greg Oden, he majored in the history of rock’n'roll! So to conclude, if the NCAA “student” athletes really were students then they should not be paid, but since they are only there for money and athletics, they should recieve a little payment for their value to their institutions.
I don’t think they should because your in school to learn not to get paid for sports and thats it.
A lot of these athletes would not even make the college if it wasn’t for the sport they participate in,
This is the hardest topic to write a persuasive essay on EVER!!!!!!!
College football is the reason why schools have money for other athletic programs
Which is true but at the same time the boys do way more work and are the common ones to actually go places for exampe NFL why not get paid for the same reason that you are trying to get to?
Tbh i think that they should because college athletes are basically doing the same thing as the NFL except they are still in school
What about other sports? Is it unfair, in your opinion, to pay a football player, but not a women’s volleyball player at the same school (for example)?
I think college sports is the only place in our Capitalist society where a person doesn’t get compensated in proportion to their value to the marketplace.
College Athletes shouldnt be paid cause they went to college for schooling not just sports
Pingback: Should College Athletes Get Paid? | My Blog